Area/Topic  |  Bibliography   |  Background   |  Hypotheses   |  Home


 
 

KRIS Ten Mile: Chart Table Page

Area North Fork Ten Mile
Topic Habitat: Pool Type and Pool Frequency, North Fork and Tributaries

Caption:  The Chart Table HAB_NFT_WQ.dbf is a North-Fork-only version of HAB_TEN_WQ.dbf, which contains summary data from Ten Mile River watershed habitat surveys in 1995-96. Georgia-Pacific staff collected data using CDFG protocol (California Department of Fish and Game, 1998). Summary data provided by the North Coast Region Water Quality Control Board in the Draft Assessment of Aquatic Conditions in the Mendocino Coast Hydrologic Unit. Field definitions are as follows (use F7 for optimal viewing): SURV_L_FT Total length of stream surveyed in feet CHN_TYP1 Rosgen channel type dominant PCT_CT1 Percent length by dominant channel type CHN_TYP2 Rosgen channel type subdominant P_C_CHNT Percent of surveyed length of channel type C P_SCPL_L Percent scour pools by length P_SCPL_A Percent scour pools by area P_LWDP_L Percent large-wood formed habitat by length P_LWDP_A Percent large-wood formed habitat by area RFL_ML_FT Mean length of riffle units RIFL_PCT Percent riffle habitat by length FLW_ML_FT Mean length of flatwater units FLT_PCT Percent flatwater habitat by length PL_ML_FT Mean length of pool units POOL_PCT Percent pool habitat by length DRY_ML_FT Mean length of dry units DRY_PCT Percent dry habitat by length MCP_PCTL Percent main-channel pool habitat by pool length SPL_PCTL Percent side-channel pool habitat by pool length BWP_PCTL Percent backwater pool habitat by pool length PDEP_PLT2 Percent of pools with maximum depth less than 2 ft PDEP_2T3 Percent of pools with maximum depth 2-3 ft PDEP_PGT3 Percent of pools with maximum depth greater than 3 ft SHLTR_AVG Average shelter rating EMBED_L1 Percentage of pool tails with embeddedness rating 1 EMBED_L2 Percentage of pool tails with embeddedness rating 2 EMBED_L3 Percentage of pool tails with embeddedness rating 3 EMBED_L4 Percentage of pool tails with embeddedness rating 4 EMBD_AVG Average embeddedness rating CAN_CONIF Percent of stream banks covered by coniferous canopy CAN_DECID Percent of stream banks covered by deciduous canopy CAN_OPEN Percent of stream banks with no canopy cover

 50 rows of a possible 177 have been displayed.
SUBBASINSTREAMSURV_L_FTCHN_TYP1PCT_CT1CHN_TYP2P_C_CHNTP_SCPL_LP_SCPL_AP_LWDP_LP_LWDP_ARFL_ML_FTRIFL_PCTFLW_ML_FTFLT_PCTPL_ML_FTPOOL_PCTDRY_ML_FTDRY_PCTMCP_PCTLSPL_PCTLBWP_PCTLPDEP_PLT2PDEP_2T3PDEP_PGT3SHLTR_AVGEMBED_L1EMBED_L2EMBED_L3EMBED_L4EMBD_AVGCAN_CONIFCAN_DECIDCAN_OPENSB_ORDACREAGE
North ForkNorth Fork82612B100NA028398953168637794792040601163153362916723.56155530221095
North ForkLittle North Fork21422C68B68273218192815544132440035614553213440012883.884449724960
North ForkPatsy Creek8009F100NA07923333346452219852663406924773112411543.083853921655
North ForkBald Hill Creek14211F53B014195729226247232610054653158311168123534192.637501321488
North ForkBuckhorn Creek11390F98B0360035256549161123815732717720348007933.935241721166
North ForkMcGuire Creek9870B84D061923231572561516101135741277185420015853.854743102-
North ForkCavanough Gulch5691B100NA04712331261281273055439511079183654454393.3237522-
North ForkGulch 85455B100NA051113027694820231032762226129106333129362.963551142-
North ForkGulch 195455F100NA0915003042363915188014151871218585823643.464938132-
North ForkBlair Gulch5236F100NA0512121815425914195677227166313420001004465402-
North ForkGulch 115021B100NA06700333671561280030700702464002445303.035130192-
North ForkBarlow Gulch3633F100NA0351220174734131117138732709730220001004485112-
North ForkO'Conner Gulch3488B100NA0870036288659141217137630663407501017723.59237612-
North ForkGulch 232454B100NA0390032384823159244307030087130400720733.663555102-



To learn more about this topic click here .
To download the table with the chart's data, click hab_nft_wq.dbf (size 6,264 bytes) .
To see meta information about the data table used for this topic click here
 
 
  www.krisweb.com